Legal Opinion

MANGO v. City of Columbus

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 9, 2021No. 2:19-cv-03120Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION COURTNEY MANGO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., : Defendants. Case Nos. 2:19-cv-3120, 2:19-cv-5282 Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. JANINNY DASILVA, Vascura Plaintiff, : v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Intervenor Ohio Mutual Insurance Company seeks a judgment that it is no longer required to defend Defendants Shane and Maria Mauger or to indemnify them should the need arise. (ECF No. 139.)1 The Maugers oppose and seek a 1 Unless otherwise noted, all…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. James F. BARNHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PICKREL, SCHAEFFER & EBELING COMPANY, L.P.A., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API