Legal Opinion

Black v. Hicks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2018No. 105248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ON RECONSIDERATION 1

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, East Cleveland Police Officer Jonathan O'Leary, East Cleveland Police Chief Ralph Spotts, the city of East Cleveland, and John Does 1-10 (collectively "appellants"), bring the instant appeal challenging the jury's verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Arnold Black ("Black"), on Black's claims for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, spoliation, battery, false imprisonment, supervisory liability, reckless/wanton/willful conduct pursuant to R.C. 2921.52, and civil conspiracy. Appellants further challenge the trial court's dismissal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. JudgesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re S.J.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re A.C.-L.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
  2. Khemsara v. Ohio Veterinary Med. Licensing Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API