Lane v. Walker
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice:
Appeal from a quiet title judgment establishing a boundary by acquiescence favorable to defendants. Affirmed.
This is an action to quiet title to an area described by metes and bounds and also by a fence or evidence of its existence uninterruptedly for upwards of 48 years, — a fact reasonably believable from facts in the record!
Plaintiffs urge that there is no evidence to indulge a fiction that there was a fence mutually “intended” to be a boundary. To' this we say that the test to establish the boundary by “acquiescence” necessarily need not be based on mutual “intent.”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fuoco v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1966
- King v. FronkUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Motzkus v. CarrollUtah Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sachs v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Williams v. OldroydUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Mason v. LovelessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Anderson v. FautinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Platt v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.