Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Rankins

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 2023No. 4:22-cv-00248Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RYAN T. ARMSTRONG, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 22-CV-0248-CVE-SH ) WILLIAM RANKINS, ) Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) OPINION AND ORDER Petitioner Ryan Armstrong, a state prisoner appearing pro se,1 brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking federal habeas relief from the judgment entered against him in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2018-1699. Respondent William Rankins has moved to dismiss the petition, arguing that Armstrong failed to file it within the one-year statute of limitations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Yang v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. Marsh v. SoaresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API