Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Whtehead

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1893PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Case for slander. Defendant brings error. ^Che facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment in an action for slander, from Avhich defendant appealed. The language, as'counted upon, is as follows:

“Tom Ellis is a damned, Ioav-lived,'thieving, son of a bitch; and I have had a man watching him, and seen him steal, and I believe you know he is a thief.”

The undisputed testimony shows that the conversation occurred in the presence of several gentlemen, all but one of whom were partners with plaintiff and defendant in the Lansing Ice Company, hereinafter mentioned. The defendant’s accusation appears to have grown out of the fact that plaintiff had taken, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leonard v. PopeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Brown v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Newman v. SteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Ritchie v. SteniusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Sternau v. MarxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Eikhoff v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Thornton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  3. Israel v. IsraelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Westra v. Estate of WestraMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Belding Savings Bank v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API