Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Valley Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 1994No. 92-2116-L-3; CA A78046PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*130DEITS, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for defendant insurer. We affirm.

In 1989, defendant Valley Insurance Company issued an automobile insurance policy to Erik and Linda Jorgensen, as the named insureds. On the morning of August 23, 1989, their 15-year-old daughter, Erika, acquired a driver’s learning permit. Later that day, Erika drove the family car without her parents’ permission and collided with plaintiffs’ car, injuring the occupants. Notice of the accident was given to defendant. However, defendant refused to defend or to pay damages for plaintiffs’ injuries. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Waller v. Rocky Mountain Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Viking Insurance v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Viking Insurance v. PerottiOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance v. HaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. PruettHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Close v. EbertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Nationwide Agri-Business Insurance Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. PruettHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API