Legal Opinion

CANTWELL v. USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 25, 2024No. 1:23-cv-03422Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE __________________________________ : SHANNON CANTWELL, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil No. 23-3422 (RBK/AMD) v. : : OPINION USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY : COMPANY, : : Defendant. : __________________________________ : KUGLER, United States District Judge: THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company’s (“USAA” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (the “Motion” or “Mot.”). (ECF No. 6). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND A.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API