Pursue Energy Corp. v. Perkins
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PRATHER, Justice,
for the Court:
I. INTRODUCTION
This case involves construction of a deed through which a mineral interest was conveyed. The language within the deed’s “four corners” was construed by the chancery court as unambiguous, and this Court affirms.
A. The Facts
The parties presented various arguments and legal theories, most of which need not be reproduced in this opinion. In essence, this Court was called upon to construe an allegedly ambiguous deed entitled “Mineral Right and Royalty Transfer.” 1 The deed, executed in 1969 by Jack and Evie Mi-chaels, conveyed to D.L. Perkins an…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown v. Credit Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Union Planters National Leasing, Inc. v. Roderick D. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Smith v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Shaw v. BurchfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pursue Energy Corp. v. PerkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Donna D. Zumwalt v. Jones County Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- One South, Inc. v. George F. Hollowell, Jr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006