Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Puget Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1902No. 4032PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Cteokge Meade Emoky, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

— On the 18th day of August, 1899, one Peter Johnson died intestate, leaving no debts. The appellant in this case survived him as his widow, there being no children of the deceased. The money hereinafter mentioned as having been paid to respondent was the community property of appellant and her deceased husband. In the month of August, 1891, the respondent entered into a verbal contract with appellant’s husband, the said Peter Johnson, whereby respondent agreed to sell and convey to appellant’s husband certain real estate in Jefferson county,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. HarvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Collier v. CoatesNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Wilson v. FinneyNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Galway v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Plummer v. BucknamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hendry v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Kemmerer v. Title & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Schweiter v. HalseyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Perkins v. AllnutMontana Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API