Legal Opinion

Larry Porchia v. James E. Dzurenda, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 12, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01839Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 Larry Porchia, Case No. 2:25-cv-01839-APG-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 8 v. [Docket No. 38] 9 James E. Dzurenda, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion seeking issuance of summonses with the 12 names and addresses for John Doe and Jane Doe Nurses. Docket No. 38. The deadline to respond 13 has now expired. See Local Rule 7-2(b). 14 The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants, particularly those who are 15 prisoners bringing civil rights claims. Blaisdell v. Frappiea,

729 F.3d 1237, 1241

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richard Blaisdell v. C. FrappieaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Cortes v. Sony Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API