Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 10, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Timothy S. Smith appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Sagadahoc County, Fritzsche, J.) following the jury verdict finding him guilty of a Class D assault in violation of 17-A M.R.SA. § 207 (1983 & Supp.1995). Smith contends that the trial court erred by failing to declare him an indigent and appoint counsel for him following his refusal to provide a release authorizing the court to gain access to financial information necessary to verify his purported indigence. We affirm the judgment.
The limited record reflects that:1 Following his receipt of a complaint…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- James v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. KahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. John L. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. James J. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ColonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- In Re StuartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re Child of Cassie S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.