Legal Opinion

TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED v. AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 23, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00748Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-748 PTG/IDD ) AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion”) by Plaintiff Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited, operating as Pragmatic Play (“Plaintiff” or “Pragmatic Play”), against Defendants AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, ASIA-PRAGMATICPLAY.COM, CHEATPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, CHEATSLOTPRAGMATICPLAYS.COM,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Francis v. GiacomelliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Ryan v. Homecomings Financial NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API