Legal Opinion
Rabin v. Bartlesville Redevelopment Trust Authority
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 2013No. 110310PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY L. GOODMAN, Judge.
¶ 1 Joel Rabin and Sharon Hurst (Rabin-Hurst) appeal the trial court's order of November 4, 2011, dismissing their action against the Bartlesville Redevelopment Trust Authority and its trustees (collectively BRTA) for an alleged violation of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, 25 O.S.2011, §§ 301 through 314 (OOMA). The appeal was originally assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36(a)(1), 12 O.S.2011, Ch. 15, App. 1. This Court ordered briefs pursuant to Rule 1.36(g).
¶ 2 Two issues are presented: 1) whether Rabin-Hurst have standing to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tuffy's, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Independent School District No. 9 v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Holbert v. EcheverriaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Lafalier v. LEAD-IMPACTED COMMUNITIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trant v. Medicolegal InvestigationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Shattuck Pharmacy Management PC v. Prime Therapeutics LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021