Legal Opinion

Vason v. Carrano

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 17, 1974No. File 130863PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTesto, J.

All the defendants have demurred to the first, second and third counts on the ground that the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over causes of action arising under the federal Civil Eights Act. 42 U.S.C. M 1981 to 2000h-6 (1970). The court finds that this demurrer must he overruled because “state and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction of suits of a civil nature arising under the Constitution and the laws of the United States . . . and actions brought under [42 U.S.C.] §§ 1983 and 1985 are no exception to the general rule.” Luker v. Nelson, 341 F. Sup. 111, 116; see also Long…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Melvin Carter v. John R. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Charles D. Long v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Thomas O. Spampinato v. The City of New York and Guenther E. WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Lakewood Homes, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentAllen County Court of Common Pleas · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marx v. Truck Renting & Leasing Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Olga J. Fox v. The Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Lindsley v. RobinsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Dickinson v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
  5. De Bleecker v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API