United States National Bank v. Duling
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentButtler, J.
It bears repeating that hard cases make bad law.
The only thing that makes this case a hard one is the negligence of the trustee over a 14-year period, not the language of the trust instrument, which is clear and unambiguous. If the majority opinion stands, there will result an untold amount of mischief with respect to other trust or testamentary instruments which use the same, not uncommon phrase: "In the event of the remarriage of my wife * * Undoubtedly, there will be some surprises to the parties involved when a court decides (as did the trial court here) that the phrase does not mean the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Smith v. RubelOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Albino v. AlbinoOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Wood v. HoneymanOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- First National Bank of Portland v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.