Legal Opinion

Mata v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 30, 2002No. 04-94-00099-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CATHERINE STONE, Justice.

This appeal is on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals. Raul Mata (“Mata”) is appealing his conviction of misdemeanor driving while intoxicated. We originally affirmed the trial court’s judgment, concluding that the testimony of George McDougall regarding the range of Mata’s blood alcohol concentration was scientifically reliable. See Mata v. State, 13 S.W.3d 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999), rev’d, 46 S.W.Sd 902 (Tex.Crim.App.2001). The Court of Criminal Appeals granted Mata’s petition for discretionary review to decide whether McDougall’s testimony was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Penagraph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Rosales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Atkinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bagheri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Bagheri v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  3. Meza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Magana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  5. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API