Legal Opinion

Mata v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 2003No. 0373-02PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant was charged with misdemean- or DWI by having an alcohol concentration of at least 0.10 or by not having the normal use of his mental and physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol into his body. The jury entered a general verdict of guilty. Originally, the Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Mata v. State, 13 S.W.3d 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, pet. granted). This Court found that the retrograde extrapolation testimony was unreliable and reversed and remanded for a harm analysis. Mata v. State, 46 S.W.3d 902 (Tex.Crim.App.2001).

On remand, the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bagheri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Bagheri v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  5. Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Magana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  3. Raul Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. Joel Magana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API