Legal Opinion

Haddad v. New York Life Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1930No. 5526PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The insurance company obtained a decree in the court below vacating a life and sickness indemnity policy upon which Haddad was making claim. The ground of the relief was that he had procured the policy by the false representation that for the preceding five years he had not consulted nor been examined or treated by any physician. It appeared beyond dispute at the trial that for some two or three years before the application date he had been suffering, habitually if not continually, severe abdominal pains with persistent fever; that for this period he had been under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. H. Kobacker & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  3. New York Life Ins. v. GoerlichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Great Northern Life Ins. Co. v. VinceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Bushfield v. World Mutual InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bushfield v. WORLD MUT. HEALTH & ACC. INS. CO. OF PASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. BoldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  5. Lyttle v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API