Legal Opinion

McKinney v. McKinney

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 14, 1994No. 93-CA-000342-MRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

SCHRODER, Judge:

This appeal requires an interpretation of KRS 389A.030, the statutory right of partition for concurrent owners and a devise of estates and future interests in land.

The testator, Wilburn J. McKinney, devised his 226 acre farm in Clark County to his wife, “[flor and during her natural life, and so long as she remains my widow ... or remarriage, whichever first occurs, ...” with a remainder in fee to his three children. His wife, Alberta McKinney, was also appointed executrix. The executrix petitioned for and received an order of sale pursuant to KRS 389A.030. The order was made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kelly v. MarrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Lucas v. ManneringCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  3. Gill v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  4. Weddle v. WeddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  5. Divine v. DivineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API