Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Harrison

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided July 1, 1961No. 581463PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P. J.

The facts which have precipitated this declaratory judgment action have been adequately set forth *180in the briefs and pleadings, so it seems unnecessary to repeat them here. The main issues with which the Probate Court is concerned are:

1. the validity of the discretionary trust under the rule against perpetuities;

2. the validity of the power of appointment, following the termination of such trust- under the rule against perpetuities; and

3. the applicability of the Ohio mortmain statute to the remainder interests to be appointed under the power of appointment.

I. VALIDITY OF THE DISCRETIONARY…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Better Business Bureau of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Murphey v. American Jewish CongressCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Thorp v. LundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Waddell v. Y. W. C. A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schafer v. DeszczOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Abram v. WilsonCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API