Thomas v. Harrison
Cuyahoga County Probate Court
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P. J.
The facts which have precipitated this declaratory judgment action have been adequately set forth *180in the briefs and pleadings, so it seems unnecessary to repeat them here. The main issues with which the Probate Court is concerned are:
1. the validity of the discretionary trust under the rule against perpetuities;
2. the validity of the power of appointment, following the termination of such trust- under the rule against perpetuities; and
3. the applicability of the Ohio mortmain statute to the remainder interests to be appointed under the power of appointment.
I. VALIDITY OF THE DISCRETIONARY…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Better Business Bureau of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Murphey v. American Jewish CongressCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Thorp v. LundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Waddell v. Y. W. C. A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schafer v. DeszczOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Abram v. WilsonCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1966