Legal Opinion
Eisenberg v. Holland Rantos Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 23, 1978No. Nos. 77-2058, 77-2059, 78-1018 and 78-1187PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.
These appeals originate from unfair labor practice charges filed with the National Labor Relations Board on April 18, 1977, by Local No. 773, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, AFL-CIO (hereafter Union). The Union’s charges alleged that Holland Rantos Co., Inc. (Holland Rantos) was engaged in unfair labor practices in violation of § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) (1976),1 by denying its employees access to Holland Rantos’ manufacturing facility which was leased from a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Eisenberg v. Hartz Mountain Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sheeran v. American Commercial Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Lineback Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Printpack, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- Silverman v. 40-41 Realty Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Kaynard v. Mego Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Sheeran v. American Commercial Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.