Legal Opinion
United States v. Wesley Jacobs and Santokh Singh Takhar
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 31, 1988No. 87-1082PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Per curiam
The government appeals the district court’s dismissal for prosecutorial misconduct of an indictment against Wesley Jacobs and Santokh Singh Takhar. The government contends that (1) no prosecuto-rial misconduct occurred and therefore the district court lacked a legal or factual basis for its dismissal, and (2) if reversed the case should be reassigned to another judge. We agree and we reverse and remand with instructions.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The indictments at issue here result from the Food and Drug Administration’s efforts to prevent the use of the drug chlo-ramphenicol in animals that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc., and Nme Hospitals, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- McCalden v. California Library Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Barrera-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SykesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.