Legal Opinion

Alley v. Neely

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Neely brought an action of slander against Alley. There are two counts in the declaration. 1. That the defendant had charged the plaintiff with perjury. 2. That the defendant had said to and of the plaintiff, “You are a d-d thieving son of a b-h; you stole and ran away.” “1 can prove that you are a d-d thieving son of a b-h, and that you stole and ran • away.” General demurrer to the second count. The plaintiff joined in demurrer, and after argument of the demurrer, prayed judgment by default on the first count. The defendant demanded a continuance which was refused. An interlocutory judgment…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herrick v. LaphamNew York Supreme Court · 1813

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tracy v. HacketIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Agnew v. HiattIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Reynolds v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API