Legal Opinion
Agnew v. Hiatt
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 1984No. 1-184A28PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Presiding Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Marshall Agnew (Agnew) appeals the Wayne Circuit Court's partial granting of Donald and Jeanine Hiatt's (Hiatts) Motion to Dismiss his amended complaint. The court sustained the motion in regard to Count I of Agnew's complaint.
We reverse.
DISCUSSION AND DECISION
In reviewing the dismissal of a complaint, the Court of Appeals must determine whether, in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, the complaint is sufficient to constitute any valid claim. Howard v. City of Kokomo, (1981) Ind.App., 429 N.E.2d 659. We assume that the allegations of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seller v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Gibson v. KINCAIDIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Marks v. JacobsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Wyant v. LobdellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Graeter v. HoganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. University of Notre DameDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Thomas J. Tacket v. Delco Remy Division of General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Bochenek v. Walgreen Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Schrader v. Eli Lilly and Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Harold Speed v. Robert E. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.