Legal Opinion

Frazier Ex Rel. Frazier v. Norton Ex Rel. Norton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1983No. 13793PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

Kenneth L. Frazier as guardian ad litem for his son Kenneth B. Frazier, and Kenneth L. Frazier individually (appellants), filed a complaint against Mark Norton individually (appellee) for $800,000.00 damages due to severe hip injuries allegedly caused by Mark pushing Ken down. Melvin T. Norton acted as guardian ad litem for his son Mark Norton. Appellee affirmatively alleged that appellants were either contrib-utorily negligent or had assumed the risk of injury. After a jury trial, a verdict was returned on February 26, 1982, in favor of appellee. Judgment was entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mueller v. MuellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. Grey OwlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Wolf v. GraberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Alley v. SiepmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. High Plains Genetics Research, Inc. v. J K Mill-Iron RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API