Legal Opinion

Richmond City v. Epps

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 29, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of tlie Hustings Court of tlie city of Riclimond, rendered January 20, 1900, on an application for a mandamus, wherein the defendant in error was the petitioner, and the plaintiff in error was the respondent.

1Opinion of the Court

Riely, J.:

Thisús a writ of error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond, upon a petition by the Sergeant of the city for a writ of mandamus to compel the Auditor of the city to issue a warrant upon its Treasurer for certain sums of money claimed by the Sergeant to be due him as jailer for receiving and supporting persons confined in jail for violating ordinances of the city, or under a capias pro fine for failure to pay fines imposed for violation of the said ordinances. The Hustings Court awarded the writ.

Mandamus no doubt lies to compel the payment of the salary or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Page v. CloptonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1878
  2. Price v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. Milliner's adm'r v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dovel v. BertramSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  2. Bellamy v. Gates and GillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
  3. Wilson v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  4. Town of Danville v. PaceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
  5. Board of Supervisors v. CoonsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API