Legal Opinion
Deutch & Shur, PC v. Roth
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 3, 1995PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
284 N.J. Super. 133 (1995)
663 A.2d 1373
DEUTCH & SHUR, P.C., A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDWIN ROTH, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Middlesex County.
Decided March 3, 1995.
Victor A. Deutch, for plaintiff (Deutch & Shur, P.C., attorneys).
LONGHI, A.J.S.C.
This is a motion made pursuant to the Frivolous Litigation Statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-59.1. Plaintiffs Deutch & Shur, P.C. seek to recover fees and costs incurred in defending a counterclaim for legal malpractice brought by defendant Edwin Roth, a former client. No one has responded or appeared on behalf of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKeown-Brand v. Trump Castle Hotel & CasinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Elberon Bathing Co., Inc. v. Ambassador Insurance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Iannone v. McHaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Henn v. Clifford J. Heath, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Del. Riv. & Bay Auth. v. NJ Pub. Emp. ReL Com.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alpert, Goldberg v. QuinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Mancuso v. Neckles Ex Rel. NecklesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Segal v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Toll Bros. v. Township of West WindsorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- HIP v. K. Hovnanian at MahwahNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.