Legal Opinion
Mancuso v. Neckles Ex Rel. Neckles
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
This appeal and that in Gallagher v. Burdette-Tomlin Medical Hospital, 163 N.J. 38, 747 A.2d 262 (2000), also decided today, present difficult exercises in the application of the discovery rule. Each case arises in the context of a claim for medical malpractice.
“The history and principles underlying the discovery rule have been examined by us on numerous occasions.” Abboud v. Viscomi, 111 N.J. 56, 62, 543 A.2d 29 (1988)(citing Vispisiano v. Ashland Chem. Co., 107 N.J. 416, 425-27, 527 A.2d 66 (1987)).
Suffice it to say that the rule’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Farrell v. Votator Division of Chemetron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- LoBiondo v. SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Roa v. RoaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Caravaggio v. D'AGOSTINISupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Edan Ben Elazar v. Macrietta Cleaners, Inc. (078079) (Union County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.