Legal Opinion

Locke v. Wood

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1820PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After a cause is opened to the jury, the plaintiff cannot become nonsuit, unless allowed by the Court.

• In this action, when the verdict was returned, which was at the last term here, the chief justice sitting, and before it was recorded, the counsel for the plaintiffs moved that the verdict be set aside, and for leave to discontinue, because they apprehended that the testimony of a material witness had been misapprehended by them in arguing the cause, and also by the jury. But the chief justice refused leave to discontinue, and ordered the verdict to be recorded ; .relieving it to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haskell v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Focke, Wilkens & Lange & Scott v. Leon & BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Haskell v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  4. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Earl Carpenter & Sons Co. v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API