Legal Opinion

(PS) Ehrenreich v. Padilla

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 25, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02422Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RYAN STEPHEN EHRENREICH, No. 2:20-cv-02422-JAM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND 14 RECOMMENDATIONS ALEX PADILLA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action and has requested authority to proceed in forma 18 pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) This action was referred to this court by Local 19 Rule 302(c)(21). 20 Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by section 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is 21 unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API