Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fox v. . Army Store

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 8, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1DissentSeawell, J.

CLARKSON and SCHENCK, JJ., concur in dissent. Civil action to recover damages for injury allegedly resulting from actionable negligence.

Certain evidence relating to the circumstances under which the alleged injury to plaintiff's left eye was received on 5 March, 1938, is set forth in opinion on former appeal. 215 N.C. 187.

Plaintiff alleges in her complaint that throughout her adult life she has been engaged in the profession of teaching in the public schools of Buncombe County, but that now since the injury of which she complains against defendant, her remaining eye has been so impaired that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Ridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Wallace v. Western N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Ledford v. Valley River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Wells Fargo & Co. v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matthews v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Rogers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  4. Lowery v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Smith v. CorsatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API