Legal Opinion

Weibeler v. Ford

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1895No. Nos. 9277—(161)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant and garnishee from an order of the district ■court for Ramsey county, Willis, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

The plaintiff holds a judgment for $747, entered in 1885 against the deiendant Patrick Ford. This appeal grows out •of a garnishment proceeding commenced on said judgment, in which Margaret Ford, the wife of Patrick, is ^charged as garnishee. On *399her disclosure she denied any indebtedness to the defendant, or any control of any money, property, or effects of the defendant. Thereupon the plaintiff filed a supplemental complaint under the statute, and issues were made up between the parties, which were tried by the court below without a jury. The court found for plaintiff, and ordered judgment…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bassi v. BassiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Worchester v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  3. Worchester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Burkee v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API