State v. Tucker
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
This case requires us to resolve two issues. The first is whether Tucker was subjected to an “interrogation” by the corrections officers without being given the requisite Miranda warnings. The second issue is whether admission of Brock’s taped statements was prejudicial error. For the reasons which follow, we determine that neither of the trial court’s separate decisions to allow Tucker’s statement and Brock’s statements into evidence was prejudicial error requiring a reversal of Tucker’s convictions. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate Tucker’s convictions.
I
After…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. KnucklesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. ReadyOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. DurganOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.