Gray Panthers v. Califano
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs present a two-pronged challenge to the constitutionality of Sections 1869(b)(2) and 1842(b)(3)(C) of the Social Security Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395ff(b)(2) and 1395u(b)(3)(C), which limit the right to an oral, evidentiary hearing on appeal under Title XVIII of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq., commonly known as the “Medicare” program, to those beneficiaries making claims in which the matter in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gray Panthers v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- General Electric Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Gray Panthers v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- McClure v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
- General Electric Co. v. BrownerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.