Legal Opinion

McClure v. Harris

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 19, 1980No. C-79-0201 WHOPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORRICK, District Judge.

Three named plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of a class of Medicare beneficiaries challenging the constitutionality of the hearing procedures available under Part B of the Medicare program. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395j-1395w, 1395ff. Defendants are Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (“HEW”), and Blue Shield of California (“Blue Shield”), a private insurance carrier that administers Part B benefits under contract with HEW.

Plaintiffs claim that the statutory scheme, whereby the final determination of whether, or to what extent, Part B…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. McClureSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re Northern District of California "Dalkon Shield" IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
  3. United States v. Morton Sanet, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. David v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  5. In Re Nuclear Imaging Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API