Legal Opinion

Fordham Bus Corporation v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 23, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to set aside an order of Division 5 of the Interstate Commerce Commission, dated April 18, 1940, affirmed by the entire Commission on June 26, 1941, in Docket No. MC-74634, Fordham Bus Corporation, Common Carrier Application. The order under review granted plaintiff a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing it to operate as an interstate common carrier by motor vehicle of passengers and their baggage in round-trip charter operations over irregular routes from New York, New York, to all points in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  2. Crescent Express Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. MertineDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1946
  4. Cornell Steamboat Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  5. Alexandria, Barcroft & Washington Transit Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API