Legal Opinion
Salmon v. Hinojosa
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 9, 1976No. 15501PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CADENA, Justice.
Defendants, Ruben Salmon and Noel Salmon, partners who are operators of a fertilizer plant known as Red Barn Chemical Company, appeal from a judgment, following a nonjury trial, against them and Tomas Vasquez in the sum of $1,128.20 for damages to buildings. Vasquez has not perfected an appeal.
The damage to the buildings resulted when a truck owned by the partnership and operated by Vasquez, an employee of the partnership, crashed into the buildings. The litigation originated as two separate suits. The first suit was filed by plaintiff, Jose S. Hinojosa, as guardian of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robertson Tank Lines, Inc. v. Van CleaveTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. MueggeTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Royal Indemnity Company v. HE Abbott & Sons, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1966
- Gulf Refining Co. v. Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Thompson v. BB SAXON COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Steven Painter Tonya Wright, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Earl A. Wright, III, Virginia Weaver, Individually and as Next Friend of A.A.C., a Minor And Tabitha R. Rosello, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albert Carillo v. Amerimex Drilling I, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
- Bell v. VPSI, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Hunsucker v. Omega Industries, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Green v. Ransor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Burl D. Pilgrim and Martha Pilgrim v. Fortune Drilling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.