Wright v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Criminal law. Recognizance. Bond. Bcire facias. Before Judge Horicins. Clayton Superior Court. September Term, 1873. Eor the facts of this case, see the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Warner, Chief Justice.
At the March term of Clayton superior court, 1872, a true bill was found by the grand jury against Peacock for the offense of fornication, who entered into a recognizance for his appearance at the September term, 1872, of said court, to answer said charge, with one Wright as his security. At the September term of the court, 1872, the s$id Peacock failed to appear, and his recognizance was adjudged by the court to be forfeited, unless at the next term of the court thereafter, to-wit: at the March term, 1873, the defendants should show cause why the judgment of forfeiture…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bird v. TerrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- People v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Garner v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Osborne Bonding Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Brooks v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.