Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramirez

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 2018No. 17-3906Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3906 United States v. Ramirez UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. Robert Sasso, Jr., and Anthony ArmientiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Domingo RexachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Frank GangiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. James Leonard, Robert Seyfert, John Papajohn and Donald M. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API