ANGLERS OF THE AuSABLE, INC v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentYoung, J.
I respectfully, but vigorously, dissent from the extraordinarily lawless and profoundly dangerous lead opinion and from the results reached by a majority of this Court.
This case represents one of the most shocking examples of the assertion of power that is not grounded in the constitution or any statute. This case is simply an empty vehicle to reach desired policy results.1 This is so because this case was moot in June 2010 when the majority inexplicably denied defendants’ meritorious motion to dismiss for mootness;2 this case was moot in November 2010 when this Court heard oral arguments *92on…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.