General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Frito-Lay Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
Appeal from the judgment of the Olmsted County District Court dismissing appellants’ actions and from its order denying a new trial. Both of these actions, which were consolidated for trial, arose out of a fire June 8, 1971, in a Rochester warehouse owned by respondents Phillip and Richard Hailing, d.b.a. Hailing Agency, Inc., and leased by respondent Frito-Lay Company. Appellants, both insurance companies, are seeking a recovery of the amounts paid their respective insureds for the losses they sustained as a result of the fire. The actions were tried to a jury. However, at the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Lommori v. Milner Hotels, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Johnson v. Prange-Geussenhainer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc. v. PrimusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Willmar, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bohme, Inc. v. Sprint International Communications Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996