Legal Opinion

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Frito-Lay Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1976No. 45776PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Yetka, Justice.

Appeal from the judgment of the Olmsted County District Court dismissing appellants’ actions and from its order denying a new trial. Both of these actions, which were consolidated for trial, arose out of a fire June 8, 1971, in a Rochester warehouse owned by respondents Phillip and Richard Hailing, d.b.a. Hailing Agency, Inc., and leased by respondent Frito-Lay Company. Appellants, both insurance companies, are seeking a recovery of the amounts paid their respective insureds for the losses they sustained as a result of the fire. The actions were tried to a jury. However, at the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Lommori v. Milner Hotels, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Johnson v. Prange-Geussenhainer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  4. E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc. v. PrimusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Willmar, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bohme, Inc. v. Sprint International Communications Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API