Legal Opinion
Cromwell v. Ream
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 17, 1935No. 25724PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
On January Í25, 1922, a contract was entered into between Elam E. Neal, S. S. Glasscock, Geo. E. Strauss, Allen I* Porter, and S. B. Hibbard, parties of the first part, and Joseph I. Cromwell, party of the second part, in which contract the parties, irt effect, fqrmed a partnership for the purpose of acquiring, developing, and selling oil and gas leases and royalties. All of the parties of the first part lived 'in or near Kansas City.
It appears that Geo. E. Strauss divided his interest in the partnership with Fred Strauss, and Glasscock divided his interest 'with G. F. Ream, and while neither…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Davis v. HoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burtrum v. BurtrumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Brooks v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Finley Lollar v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.