Legal Opinion
Garfinkle v. Pfizer, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 12, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered February 21, 1990, granting a motion by plaintiff Norton Garfinkle for summary judgment to the extent of declaring that the plaintiff is not bound by a restrictive covenant between him and defendant Oral Research Laboratories, and dismissing the counterclaims of the defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In view of the well-established considerations for enforcement of restrictive employment covenants (see, Greenwich Mills Co. v Barrie House Coffee Co., 91 AD2d 398, 400-401 [2d Dept 1983]), the defendants have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Greenwich Mills Co. v. Barrie House Coffee Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Primo Enterprise v. BachnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Investor Access Corp. v. Doremus & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- ABH Nature's Products, Inc. v. Supplement Manufacturing Partner, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024