Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Aiken
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 27, 1986No. Civ. A. No. C85-3501APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FORRESTER, District Judge.
This action is before the court on the motion of certain of the defendants for attorney's fees pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules, of Civil Procedure. In a prior order issued by this court, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed on the grounds that it was frivolous. The counts of the complaint subject to this motion are Count III, in which plaintiff alleged a violation of the antitrust laws by the moving defendants, which this court dismissed because plaintiff had failed to allege that he had suffered any “antitrust injury” as defined by case law; Count V of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Mohammed v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- Snyder v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
- Peth v. BreitzmannDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James Thomas Patterson, Sr. v. Lawrence L. AikenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Marcus B. Harris v. Walter Heinrich, David M. Parrish, Benny BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- In Re KTMA Acquisition Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. The City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Brown v. Consolidated FreightwayDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.