Legal Opinion

Nashua Corp. v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 30, 1954No. 4328PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The question presented here is whether a wife who leaves her employment to join her husband in another state in a newly established home is entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. The pertinent part of the governing statute provides that the claimant shall be disqualified for benefits for a specified period after she has left her work “voluntarily without good cause in accordance with rules and regulations of the commissioner.”' R. L., c. 218, s. 4 A, as amended by Laws 1947, c. 59, s. 12. The applicable regulation, which is quoted in full in the statement of facts, provides that an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alabama Textile Products CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Huiet v. Schwob Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Moore v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Farloo v. Champion Spark Plug Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. California Portland Cement Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. St. Germain v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Appeal of Work-a-Day of Nashua, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Appeal of the City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. Vincent v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API