Nashua Corp. v. Brown
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The question presented here is whether a wife who leaves her employment to join her husband in another state in a newly established home is entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. The pertinent part of the governing statute provides that the claimant shall be disqualified for benefits for a specified period after she has left her work “voluntarily without good cause in accordance with rules and regulations of the commissioner.”' R. L., c. 218, s. 4 A, as amended by Laws 1947, c. 59, s. 12. The applicable regulation, which is quoted in full in the statement of facts, provides that an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte Alabama Textile Products CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Huiet v. Schwob Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Moore v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Farloo v. Champion Spark Plug Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by14 opinions
- California Portland Cement Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- St. Germain v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Appeal of Work-a-Day of Nashua, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Appeal of the City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Vincent v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.