Legal Opinion

Dailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1938No. 27147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “In this State the husband is recognized by law as the head of his family, and, where he and his wife reside together, the legal presumption is -that the house and all the household effects, including any intoxicating liquors, belong to the husband as the head of the family. This presumption of course is rebuttable. Young v. State, 22 Ga. App. 111 (95 S. E. 478), and authorities cited.” Hendrix v. State, 24 Ga. App. 56 (100 S. E. 55); Isom v. State, 32 Ga. App. 75 (122 S. E. 722) ; Penney v. State, 43 Ga. App. 466, 467 (159 S. E. 289) ; Barron v. State, 46 Ga. App. 829 (169 S. E. 323).

2.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Isom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Hendrix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Penney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lemon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Brawner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Hutchens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Faust v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API