Legal Opinion
Minch v. Town of Mead
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1998No. 96CA2217PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MARQUEZ.
In this action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief concerning an annexation ordinance, plaintiff, Edward Minch, appeals the judgment dismissing his complaint against defendant, the Town of Mead (Mead). As the basis for the dismissal, the trial court ruled that the city’s ordinance is a legitimate exercise of the initiative powers granted to the People and that it does not conflict with the Municipal Annexation Act, § 31-12-101, et seq., C.R.S.1997. We affirm.
In January 1995, a group of Mead residents submitted an initiative relating to the annexation of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McKee v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- C & M Sand & Gravel, Division of C & M Ready Mix Concrete Co. of Boulder v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fort Collins-Loveland Water District v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- City of Colorado Springs v. Kitty Hawk Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- City of Idaho Springs v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCarty v. Kaiser-Hill Co., LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Town of Frederick v. North American Resources Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of Greenwood VillageColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of AuroraColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Sinclair Marketing Inc. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.