Legal Opinion

McCoun v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL by the defendant from a judgment entered on the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Talcott, J.

This action is brought upon the allegation that the defendant by its servants, &c., negligently set fire to and destroyed the plaintiff’s raspberry patch, of about two acres. The fire was started by means of a burning brand thrown from a passing locomotive on to the defendant’s own land, where it set fire to the grass, and the fire thus spread to and was communicated to the raspberry patch which adjoined. It was not shown that the person who threw off the brand was in the employ of the defendant. It was shown that the person who threw off the brand was upon the engine,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Field v. . N.Y.C.R.R.New York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Webb v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburgh RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Connor v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Hennessey v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Shepp v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Iaquinto v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Van Dike v. Pullman Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API