Legal Opinion
People v. Arcuri
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 25, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2011]; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d 740 [2007]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dillon, Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. FoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018