Legal Opinion
Spudnuts, Inc. v. Lane
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 6, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4735PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 Ariz. 35 (1984)
676 P.2d 669
SPUDNUTS, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee,
v.
John LANE, dba Spudnuts Franchise, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 2 CA-CIV 4735.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.
February 6, 1984.
Cavness & DeRose by Jerry DeRose, Globe, for plaintiff/appellee.
Patten, Montague & Arnett by Wayne C. Arnett, Tempe, for defendant/appellant.
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.
This appeal arises from the amendment of a judgment to add a party-defendant after the original judgment was affirmed on appeal.
The applicable facts are as follows. The original action was filed July 28, 1978,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- H. L. Moore, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. J. C. Knowles, Defendants-Appellants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Eng v. SteinArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Spudnuts, Inc. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Benson v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Heinig v. HudmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- C & J TRAVEL, INC. v. ShumwayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- National Bank of Arizona v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Oyakawa v. GillettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Oyakawa v. GillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.